From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [ANN] Meeting minutes of the Cambourne meeting Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:37:21 +0200 Message-ID: <201108302237.22468.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> References: <201107261647.19235.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <20110830201929.GS2061@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Mark Brown , Tuukka Toivonen , Tomasz Stanislawski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Sakari Ailus , Marek Szyprowski , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sylwester Nawrocki , linux-media , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Hans Verkuil , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 30 August 2011 22:35:59 Grant Likely wrote: > On Aug 30, 2011 2:19 PM, "Mark Brown" wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:12:30PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Would such a device be included in the DT ? My understanding is that > > > the DT should only describe the hardware. > > > > For ASoC they will be, the view is that the schematic for the board is > > sufficiently interesting to count as hardware. > > Yes. Aggregate devices are sufficiently complex that there is a strong > argument for using a node to describe one. Is there any document or sample implementation ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart