From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] Add new fdtput utility to write values to fdt Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 23:00:10 +1000 Message-ID: <20110908130010.GV30278@yookeroo.fritz.box> References: <1315425260-2711-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <1315425260-2711-6-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <20110908053209.GT30278@yookeroo.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Simon Glass Cc: Devicetree Discuss List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 05:51:28AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi David, > = > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:32 PM, David Gibson > wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:54:19PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > >> This simple utility allows writing of values into a device tree from t= he > >> command line. It aimes to be the opposite of fdtget. > >> > [snip] > >> =A0include Makefile.dtc > >> =A0include Makefile.ftdump > >> =A0include Makefile.fdtget > >> +include Makefile.fdtput > > > > Separate makefile fragments for the two utilities seems overkill. > > Can't you just have one Makefile.utils or something. > = > Yes of course - I was just following the existing code patterns. > Should I roll ftdump into there as well? Yes, might as well. -- = David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson