From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:31 -0600 Message-ID: <20110920180731.GL7781@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1316537186-26753-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <201109201943.29510.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201109201943.29510.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Stephen Warren , nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, Shawn Guo , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson , Chris Ball , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:43:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote: > > The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each > > type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren > > Acked-by: Olof Johansson > > --- > > I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch, > > but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch? > > > > Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should > go into the same one. > > If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch. Already upstream g.