From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>,
"Hilman, Kevin" <khilman@ti.com>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] OMAP2+: board-generic: Add DT support to generic board
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:37:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110926213750.GG6324@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E80717A.3040502@ti.com>
* Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com> [110926 05:01]:
> On 9/24/2011 1:08 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com> [110923 12:50]:
> >>Re-cycle the original board-generic file to support Device Tree
> >>for every OMAP2+ variants.
> >>Note: Since it is a completely new content in the existing file
> >>I removed the original copyright.
> >
> >I'd suggest just keeping it, maybe just update the comments
> >accordingly?
>
> Do you mean keeping it and adding the comment? Or removing it and
> adding the comment?
Maybe just update the comment accordingly for DT?
> >That's because Copyrights in general just don't "disappear".
>
> OK, maybe, but I thought it is weird to keep an old copyright just
> because we re-use an already existing file since the content is
> different.
Yeah.. But it's still a good idea not to mess with the copyrights
as as you would need permissions from the copyright holders.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-26 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-23 20:23 [PATCH 00/11] OMAP: Add initial support for DT on OMAP3 & OMAP4 Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:16 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Use SoC specifc map_io Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:18 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove custom init_irq for remaining boards Tony Lindgren
2012-05-04 15:59 ` [PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions Thomas Petazzoni
2012-05-14 15:06 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-14 19:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] arm/dts: Add initial device tree support for OMAP4 SoC Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] arm/dts: Add support for OMAP4 PandaBoard Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:21 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-26 12:38 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] arm/dts: Add support for OMAP4 SDP board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] arm/dts: Add initial device tree support for OMAP3 SoC Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] arm/dts: Add support for OMAP3 Beagle board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 07/11] OMAP2+: board-generic: Add DT support to generic board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 12:35 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 21:37 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-09-26 6:32 ` Rajendra Nayak
[not found] ` <4E801C62.5020700-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-26 9:00 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] OMAP2+: board-generic: Add i2c static init Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 23:47 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-26 16:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] OMAP2+: l3-noc: Add support for device-tree Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 10/11] arm/dts: OMAP4: Add a main ocp entry bound to l3-noc driver Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 22:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 12:13 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 21:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 11/11] arm/dts: OMAP3+: Add mpu, dsp and iva nodes Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:26 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110926213750.GG6324@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).