From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt: Add empty of_match_node() macro Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20111024142520.GY8708@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1319450012-13033-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1319450012-13033-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: robherring2@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:53:32AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Add an empty macro for of_match_node() that will save > some '#ifdef CONFIG_OF' for non-dt builds. > > I have chosen to use a macro instead of a function to > be able to avoid defining the first parameter. > In fact, this "struct of_device_id *" first parameter > is usualy not defined as well on non-dt builds. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre After private discussion, yes this is okay. I've picked it up. g. > --- > include/linux/of.h | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h > index 736b747..92c40a1 100644 > --- a/include/linux/of.h > +++ b/include/linux/of.h > @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_parse_phandle(struct device_node *np, > } > > #define of_match_ptr(_ptr) NULL > +#define of_match_node(_matches, _node) NULL > #endif /* CONFIG_OF */ > > static inline int of_property_read_u32(const struct device_node *np, > -- > 1.7.5.4 >