From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:03:28 +0000
Message-ID: <20111206110328.GP14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1322867573.11728.22.camel@pasglop> <20111205161157.GA27550@localhost.localdomain> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112051236350.2357@xanadu.home> <20111205180253.GB29812@localhost.localdomain> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112051310150.2357@xanadu.home> <20111205192605.GD29812@localhost.localdomain> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112051443190.2357@xanadu.home> <20111206093709.GB2274@linaro.org> <20111206104654.GN14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <CAMuHMdXvuwXps7j2jz18aB1VueLh5Vn0m94jLvBEO-CmsG1JxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXvuwXps7j2jz18aB1VueLh5Vn0m94jLvBEO-CmsG1JxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:00:12PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:46, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > But.. let's make one thing clear: Alan Cox and Linus have been goin=
g on
> > about how IRQ0 should not be used. =A0Let's be crystal clear: even =
x86
> > uses IRQ0. =A0It happens to be the PIC timer, and that gets claimed=
 early
> > on during the x86 boot. =A0So please don't tell me that x86 avoids =
IRQ0.
> > It doesn't. =A0It just happens that x86 never shows IRQ0 to anythin=
g but
> > the i8253 PIC driver.
>=20
> It's shown in /proc/interrupts due to a "bug" in show_interrupts().
> The (gmail damaged) patch below fixes this bug.

So we now try to hide the fact that there _is_ an interrupt called 0
on x86 systems?  Sorry, I can't that that seriously in any way.