From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ASoC: Allow device tree to specify a card's name Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 01:31:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20111208013147.GE5748@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1323291510-22338-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1323291510-22338-1-git-send-email-swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Liam Girdwood , Rob Herring , alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 01:58:25PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > +sound { > + compatible = "nvidia,tegra-audio-wm8903", > + "generic,soc-audio-complex"; > + user-visible-name = "tegra-wm8903-harmony"; That user visible name is idiomatic for device tree but it's not idiomatic for humans I fear :) I'd be tempted to use embedded or something indicating that it's for the use of discrete components rather than SoC. Not had a chance to look at the actual code yet, sorry.