From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ASoC: Allow device tree to specify a card's name Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:17:47 +0800 Message-ID: <20111209031745.GA26952@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1323291510-22338-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <1323371825.9968.5.camel@odin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1323371825.9968.5.camel@odin> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Liam Girdwood Cc: Stephen Warren , Rob Herring , alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:17:05PM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote: > It also seems that once 1 & 2 are applied, we would almost be able to > just have a generic "device tree" machine driver for some simple ASoC > machines that have DAPM and no other external logic atm. We would just > be missing some runtime configuration for the the DAIs though. The big problem being sidestepped here is clocks.