From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
ben-linux@fluff.org, a.zummo@towertech.it,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rtc-s3c: make room for more variants in devicetree block
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:51:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112121351.14362.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuYYwSvk1_tvNvukn-BQ4Z3JEeD15djs9xP_=jWz4vG-xs_nw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Thomas,
thanks for your review and you are of course right with both your suggestions.
I will submit a v2 series shortly, implementing these suggestions.
Heiko
Am Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, 06:47:43 schrieb Thomas Abraham:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On 9 December 2011 15:20, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Use the data field of of_device_id to hold the type for
> > s3c_cpu_type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> > index 175067a..71807a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> > @@ -428,11 +428,18 @@ static int __devexit s3c_rtc_remove(struct
> > platform_device *dev) return 0;
> > }
>
> This patch looks fine but the number of #ifdef's can be reduced in
> this patch as below.
>
> static const struct of_device_id s3c_rtc_dt_match[];
>
> static inline int s3c_rtc_get_driver_data(struct platfrom_device *pdev)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> const struct of_device_id *match;
> match = of_match_node(s3c_rtc_dt_match,
> pdev->dev.of_node); return match->data;
> }
> #endif
> return platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> }
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > +static const struct of_device_id s3c_rtc_dt_match[];
> > +#endif
> > +
> > static int __devinit s3c_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct rtc_device *rtc;
> > struct rtc_time rtc_tm;
> > struct resource *res;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > + const struct of_device_id *match;
> > +#endif
>
> *match not required here.
>
> > int ret;
> >
> > pr_debug("%s: probe=%p\n", __func__, pdev);
> > @@ -509,12 +516,15 @@ static int __devinit s3c_rtc_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev) }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > - if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> > - s3c_rtc_cpu_type =
> > of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, -
> > "samsung,s3c6410-rtc") ? TYPE_S3C64XX : TYPE_S3C2410; - else
> > + if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> > + match = of_match_node(s3c_rtc_dt_match,
> > pdev->dev.of_node); + s3c_rtc_cpu_type = match->data;
> > + } else {
> > #endif
> > s3c_rtc_cpu_type =
> > platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data; +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > + }
> > +#endif
>
> This gets replaced with
>
> s3c_rtc_cpu_type = s3c_rtc_get_driver_data(pdev);
>
> > /* Check RTC Time */
> >
> > @@ -638,8 +648,13 @@ static int s3c_rtc_resume(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > static const struct of_device_id s3c_rtc_dt_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-rtc" },
> > - { .compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc" },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-rtc"
> > + .data = TYPE_S3C2410,
> > + }, {
> > + .compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc"
> > + .data = TYPE_S3C64XX,
> > + },
> > {},
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, s3c_rtc_dt_match);
> > --
> > 1.7.5.4
>
> Patch looks fine except the #ifdef's which can be reduced.
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>
> Regards,
> Thomas.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-12 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201112091046.26563.heiko@sntech.de>
2011-12-09 9:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] rtc-s3c: make room for more variants in devicetree block Heiko Stübner
2011-12-11 5:47 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-12-12 12:51 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112121351.14362.heiko@sntech.de \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).