From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP2+: kconfig: Enable devicetree by default for OMAP2+ systems Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:38:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20111213223855.GW32251@atomide.com> References: <1323190149-6492-2-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> <1323782836.1877.79.camel@deskari> <4EE75448.4010701@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EE75448.4010701@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Cousson, Benoit" Cc: Tomi Valkeinen , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Cousson, Benoit [111213 05:02]: > On 12/13/2011 2:27 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 17:49 +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote: > >>devicetree will become the mandatory boot method for OMAP2+. > >>In order to avoid cluttering the OMAP code with #ifdef CONFIG_OF, > >>select USE_OF by default for every OMAP2+ systems. > >>Select as well the APPENDED_DTB and ATAG_DTB_COMPAT to allow legacy > >>boot loader to keep working properly. > > > >APPENDED_DTB sounds a bit dangerous to be enabled by default according > >to the config help text. > > The help is indeed really scary :-) Heh, but it's also true. > Tony, > Do we want to keep it by default? Or should we fix the kconfig help? Let's just leave out those two from omap2plus_defconfig then. Regards, Tony