From: Jamie Iles <jamie-wmLquQDDieKakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: at91/gpio: add DT support
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:11:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111216101147.GA3230@totoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <876f676ec80d2db927e379654be76171ca496422.1323975517.git.nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Hi Nicolas, Jean-Christophe,
This looks pretty good to me, but a couple of minor comments inline.
Jamie
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 08:16:05PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
> index 7ffb893..edb453a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>
> #include <mach/hardware.h>
> #include <mach/at91_pio.h>
> @@ -624,40 +625,122 @@ static void at91_gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
> +static void __init of_at91_gpio_init_one(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + int alias_id;
> + struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio;
> + const unsigned int *intspec;
> +
> + if (!np)
> + return;
> +
> + alias_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "gpio");
> + if (alias_id >= MAX_GPIO_BANKS) {
> + pr_err("at91_gpio, failed alias id(%d) > MAX_GPIO_BANKS(%d), ignoring.\n",
> + alias_id, MAX_GPIO_BANKS);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + at91_gpio = &gpio_chip[alias_id];
> + at91_gpio->chip.base = alias_id * at91_gpio->chip.ngpio;
> +
> + at91_gpio->regbase = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + if (!at91_gpio->regbase) {
> + pr_err("at91_gpio.%d, failed to map registers, ignoring.\n",
> + alias_id);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Get the interrupts property */
> + intspec = of_get_property(np, "interrupts", NULL);
> + BUG_ON(!intspec);
> + at91_gpio->id = be32_to_cpup(intspec);
Use of_property_read_u32()? Also, BUG_ON() seems a bit harsh, better to
print a warning and return an error.
> +
> + at91_gpio->clock = clk_get_sys(NULL, at91_gpio->chip.label);
> + if (!at91_gpio->clock) {
> + pr_err("at91_gpio.%d, failed to get clock, ignoring.\n",
> + alias_id);
> + return;
Perhaps unmap the regs here?
> + }
> +
> + /* enable PIO controller's clock */
> + clk_enable(at91_gpio->clock);
Missing return value check.
> +
> + at91_gpio->chip.of_node = np;
> + gpio_banks = max(gpio_banks, alias_id + 1);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init of_at91_gpio_init(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * This isn't ideal, but it gets things hooked up until this
> + * driver is converted into a platform_device
> + */
> + do {
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(np, NULL, "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio");
> +
> + of_at91_gpio_init_one(np);
> + } while (np);
for_each_compatible_node9)?
> +
> + return gpio_banks > 0 ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#else
> +static int __init of_at91_gpio_init(void)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static void __init at91_gpio_init_one(int i, u32 regbase, int id)
> +{
> + struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = &gpio_chip[i];
> +
> + at91_gpio->chip.base = i * at91_gpio->chip.ngpio;
> + at91_gpio->id = id;
> +
> + at91_gpio->regbase = ioremap(regbase, 512);
> + if (!at91_gpio->regbase) {
> + pr_err("at91_gpio.%d, failed to map registers, ignoring.\n", i);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + at91_gpio->clock = clk_get_sys(NULL, at91_gpio->chip.label);
> + if (!at91_gpio->clock) {
> + pr_err("at91_gpio.%d, failed to get clock, ignoring.\n", i);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* enable PIO controller's clock */
> + clk_enable(at91_gpio->clock);
Missing return value check?
> + gpio_banks = max(gpio_banks, i + 1);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Called from the processor-specific init to enable GPIO pin support.
> */
> void __init at91_gpio_init(struct at91_gpio_bank *data, int nr_banks)
> {
> - unsigned i;
> + unsigned i;
> struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio, *last = NULL;
>
> BUG_ON(nr_banks > MAX_GPIO_BANKS);
>
> - gpio_banks = nr_banks;
> + if (of_at91_gpio_init() < 0) {
> + /* no GPIO controller found in device tree */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_banks; i++)
> + at91_gpio_init_one(i, data[i].regbase, data[i].id);
> + }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_banks; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++) {
> at91_gpio = &gpio_chip[i];
>
> - at91_gpio->id = data[i].id;
> - at91_gpio->chip.base = i * 32;
> -
> - at91_gpio->regbase = ioremap(data[i].regbase, 512);
> - if (!at91_gpio->regbase) {
> - pr_err("at91_gpio.%d, failed to map registers, ignoring.\n", i);
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - at91_gpio->clock = clk_get_sys(NULL, at91_gpio->chip.label);
> - if (!at91_gpio->clock) {
> - pr_err("at91_gpio.%d, failed to get clock, ignoring.\n", i);
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - /* enable PIO controller's clock */
> - clk_enable(at91_gpio->clock);
> -
> - /* AT91SAM9263_ID_PIOCDE groups PIOC, PIOD, PIOE */
> + /*
> + * GPIO controller are grouped on some SoC:
> + * PIOC, PIOD and PIOE can share the same IRQ line
> + */
> if (last && last->id == at91_gpio->id)
> last->next = at91_gpio;
> last = at91_gpio;
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-16 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-15 19:16 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: at91: irqdomain and device tree for AIC and GPIO Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <1323976568-20244-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-15 19:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] ARM: at91/aic: add irq domain and device tree support Nicolas Ferre
2011-12-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: at91/gpio: add irqdomain to gpio interrupts Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <56e135f94dc4d88ab6d586f13e406977c4f4bb35.1323975517.git.nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-04 19:42 ` Grant Likely
2011-12-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: at91/gpio: add DT support Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <876f676ec80d2db927e379654be76171ca496422.1323975517.git.nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-16 10:11 ` Jamie Iles [this message]
2012-01-03 16:25 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-01-03 18:34 ` [PATCH v2 " Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <1325615688-16860-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-04 19:45 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-04 22:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-05 19:42 ` [PATCH v3 " Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <1325792566-32700-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-05 17:50 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-01-05 20:03 ` [PATCH v4 " Nicolas Ferre
2011-12-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: at91/gpio: add .to_irq gpio_chip handler and rework irq_to_gpio Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <57a5d54dd158c909a3c854b5bfc873a5f43e60ea.1323975517.git.nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-04 19:47 ` Grant Likely
2011-12-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: at91/gpio: remove the static specification of gpio_chip.base Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <62da3cffc145e2ada7ecbf4939a6029eb482d116.1323975517.git.nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-04 19:47 ` Grant Likely
2011-12-15 19:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: at91/board-dt: remove AIC irq domain from board file Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <9fea5224b3a6544bd07c6e877d12870de9403b98.1323975517.git.nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-04 19:48 ` Grant Likely
2011-12-16 1:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM: at91: irqdomain and device tree for AIC and GPIO Rob Herring
[not found] ` <4EEAA4A7.3040902-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-16 16:29 ` Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <85d531b5686e5eff623bed9618f802198409905f.1323975517.git.nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-04 19:40 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] ARM: at91/aic: add irq domain and device tree support Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20120104194059.GY15503-e0URQFbLeQY2iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-05 16:26 ` Nicolas Ferre
[not found] ` <4F05CF48.5050007-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-05 18:02 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111216101147.GA3230@totoro \
--to=jamie-wmlquqddiekakbo8gow8eq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).