From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] gpio: add a driver for the Synopsys DesignWare APB GPIO block Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:27:01 +0000 Message-ID: <20120102122700.GJ2899@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1324345431-12251-1-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com> <20111230195955.GA3427@page> <4EFE1E35.106@gmail.com> <20120102121428.GA18443@sirena.org.uk> <20120102122400.GA6124@page> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120102122400.GA6124@page> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Jamie Iles Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Linus Walleij , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:24:00PM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote: > The IRQ part is dependent on Rob's patches to introduce irq domain > support into the generic chip though, so how about I split this into two > patches, one that does the basic GPIO stuff and another that does the > IRQ portion (with the dependency change) and if Rob's patches don't make > it in we drop the IRQ support for the GPIO? Yeah, epecially since the IRQ domain stuff is still giving unbootable kernels in -next as far as I know.