devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>
To: jdl-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: RFC: option to toggle dtc checks on and off
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:41:29 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120109024129.GH5628@truffala.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111028051525.GA7215-MK4v0fQdeXQXU02nzanrWNbf9cGiqdzd@public.gmane.org>

Jon, I was hoping I'd get some comment on this patch eventually.

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 04:15:25PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> Here is a draft patch which adds a -C option to dtc, allowing
> individual semantic checks to be turned on and off.  It also allows
> indivudual checks to be set as triggering either warnings or errors.
> 
> I have a couple of concerns about it in its present form.  First, the
> current syntax is that "-C -checkname" disables a check, "-C
> checkname" turns a check on as a warning and "-C +checkname" turns it
> on as an error.  I'm not convinced this is a great syntax.
> 
> Second, turning on a check will force on all prerequisite checks for
> it.  Turning a check off will disable all checks for which it is a
> prerequisite.  This seems necessary, since a check can't safely be
> executed without having first checked its prereqs, but this could have
> some very non-obvious effects from the command line.
> 
> Index: dtc/checks.c
> ===================================================================
> --- dtc.orig/checks.c	2011-04-11 13:47:41.000000000 +1000
> +++ dtc/checks.c	2011-10-28 14:42:31.846917479 +1100
> @@ -644,6 +644,69 @@ static struct check *check_table[] = {
>  	&obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller,
>  };
>  
> +static void set_check_level(struct check *c, int level)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	fprintf(stderr, "Setting '%s' check level to %d\n",
> +		c->name, level);
> +
> +	if (level > c->level) {
> +		/* Raising level, also raise it for prereqs */
> +		for (i = 0; i < c->num_prereqs; i++)
> +			set_check_level(c->prereq[i], level);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (level < c->level) {
> +		/* Lowering level, also lower it for things this is
> +		 * the prereq for */
> +		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(check_table); i++) {
> +			struct check *cc = check_table[i];
> +			int j;
> +
> +			for (j = 0; j < cc->num_prereqs; j++)
> +				if (cc->prereq[j] == c)
> +					set_check_level(cc, level);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	c->level = level;
> +}
> +
> +void parse_checks_option(const char *optarg)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	const char *name;
> +	int level;
> +
> +	switch (optarg[0]) {
> +	case '-':
> +		level = IGNORE;
> +		name = optarg + 1;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case '+':
> +		level = ERROR;
> +		name = optarg + 1;
> +		break;
> +
> +	default:
> +		level = WARN;
> +		name = optarg;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(check_table); i++) {
> +		struct check *c = check_table[i];
> +
> +		if (streq(c->name, name)) {
> +			set_check_level(c, level);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	die("Unrecognized check name \"%s\"\n", name);
> +}
> +
>  void process_checks(int force, struct boot_info *bi)
>  {
>  	struct node *dt = bi->dt;
> Index: dtc/dtc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- dtc.orig/dtc.c	2011-07-18 09:20:15.000000000 +1000
> +++ dtc/dtc.c	2011-10-28 14:43:34.743229363 +1100
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  	minsize    = 0;
>  	padsize    = 0;
>  
> -	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hI:O:o:V:R:S:p:fqb:vH:s")) != EOF) {
> +	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hI:O:o:V:R:S:p:fqb:vH:sC:")) != EOF) {
>  		switch (opt) {
>  		case 'I':
>  			inform = optarg;
> @@ -162,6 +162,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  			sort = 1;
>  			break;
>  
> +		case 'C':
> +			parse_checks_option(optarg);
> +			break;
> +
>  		case 'h':
>  		default:
>  			usage();
> Index: dtc/dtc.h
> ===================================================================
> --- dtc.orig/dtc.h	2011-10-12 09:56:55.000000000 +1100
> +++ dtc/dtc.h	2011-10-28 14:42:31.846917479 +1100
> @@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ void sort_tree(struct boot_info *bi);
>  
>  /* Checks */
>  
> +void parse_checks_option(const char *optarg);
>  void process_checks(int force, struct boot_info *bi);
>  
>  /* Flattened trees */
> 
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-09  2:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-28  5:15 RFC: option to toggle dtc checks on and off David Gibson
     [not found] ` <20111028051525.GA7215-MK4v0fQdeXQXU02nzanrWNbf9cGiqdzd@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-09  2:41   ` David Gibson [this message]
     [not found]     ` <20120109024129.GH5628-MK4v0fQdeXQXU02nzanrWNbf9cGiqdzd@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-09 14:07       ` Jon Loeliger
     [not found]         ` <E1RkFso-00007g-Ue-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-11 12:19           ` David Gibson
     [not found]             ` <20120111121941.GI4935-MK4v0fQdeXQXU02nzanrWNbf9cGiqdzd@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-11 13:38               ` Jamie Iles
2012-01-12  3:17                 ` David Gibson
     [not found]                   ` <20120112031714.GQ4935-MK4v0fQdeXQXU02nzanrWNbf9cGiqdzd@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-12 10:14                     ` Jamie Iles

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120109024129.GH5628@truffala.fritz.box \
    --to=david-xt8fgy+axnrb3ne2bgzf6laj5h9x9tb+@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jdl-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).