* [RFC PATCH 1/9] arm: avoid using on_each_cpu hard coded ret value
2012-01-03 14:19 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value Gilad Ben-Yossef
@ 2012-01-03 14:19 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-09 8:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-03 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] ppc: " Gilad Ben-Yossef
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef @ 2012-01-03 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef, Michal Nazarewicz, Will Deacon, Peter Zijlstra,
Paul Mackerras, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Russell King, Grant Likely, Rob Herring, linux-arm-kernel,
devicetree-discuss
on_each_cpu always returns a hard coded return code of zero.
Removing all tests based on this return value saves run time
cycles for compares and code bloat for branches.
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
CC: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
CC: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 88b0941..bfd58d8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int __init
cpu_pmu_reset(void)
{
if (cpu_pmu && cpu_pmu->reset)
- return on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu->reset, NULL, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu->reset, NULL, 1);
return 0;
}
arch_initcall(cpu_pmu_reset);
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] arm: avoid using on_each_cpu hard coded ret value
2012-01-03 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] arm: avoid using on_each_cpu hard coded ret value Gilad Ben-Yossef
@ 2012-01-09 8:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2012-01-09 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef
Cc: linux-kernel, Russell King, Peter Zijlstra, devicetree-discuss,
Will Deacon, Michal Nazarewicz, Grant Likely, Paul Mackerras,
Rob Herring, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ingo Molnar,
linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> on_each_cpu always returns a hard coded return code of zero.
>
> Removing all tests based on this return value saves run time
> cycles for compares and code bloat for branches.
>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
> CC: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> CC: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 88b0941..bfd58d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int __init
> cpu_pmu_reset(void)
> {
> if (cpu_pmu && cpu_pmu->reset)
> - return on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu->reset, NULL, 1);
> + on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu->reset, NULL, 1);
> return 0;
> }
> arch_initcall(cpu_pmu_reset);
This patch results in no binary change for my test build with SMP=n and
it saves one instruction on SMP=y.
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 5/9] ppc: avoid using on_each_cpu hard coded ret value
2012-01-03 14:19 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-03 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] arm: avoid using on_each_cpu hard coded ret value Gilad Ben-Yossef
@ 2012-01-03 14:19 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-03 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] smp: refactor on_each_cpu to void returning func Gilad Ben-Yossef
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef @ 2012-01-03 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef, Michal Nazarewicz, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Paul Mackerras, Grant Likely, Rob Herring, linuxppc-dev,
devicetree-discuss
on_each_cpu always returns a hard coded return code of zero.
Removing all tests based on this return value saves run time
cycles for compares and code bloat for branches.
CC: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
CC: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
index 517b1d8..829629e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
@@ -850,8 +850,7 @@ int rtas_ibm_suspend_me(struct rtas_args *args)
/* Call function on all CPUs. One of us will make the
* rtas call
*/
- if (on_each_cpu(rtas_percpu_suspend_me, &data, 0))
- atomic_set(&data.error, -EINVAL);
+ on_each_cpu(rtas_percpu_suspend_me, &data, 0);
wait_for_completion(&done);
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 8/9] smp: refactor on_each_cpu to void returning func
2012-01-03 14:19 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-03 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] arm: avoid using on_each_cpu hard coded ret value Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-03 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] ppc: " Gilad Ben-Yossef
@ 2012-01-03 14:19 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-03 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value Michal Nazarewicz
2012-01-06 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef @ 2012-01-03 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: linux-ia64, David Airlie, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Will Deacon,
dri-devel, Grant Likely, Paul Mackerras, H. Peter Anvin,
Russell King, x86, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Matt Turner, Fenghua Yu, Peter Zijlstra, devicetree-discuss,
Michal Nazarewicz, Gilad Ben-Yossef, Ivan Kokshaysky, Rob Herring,
Thomas Gleixner, linux-arm-kernel, Richard Henderson, Tony Luck
on_each_cpu returns the retunr value of smp_call_function
which is hard coded to 0.
Refactor on_each_cpu to a void function and the few callers
that check the return value to save compares and branches.
CC: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
CC: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
CC: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
CC: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
CC: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
CC: x86@kernel.org
CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
CC: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
CC: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
---
include/linux/smp.h | 7 +++----
kernel/smp.c | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
index 8cc38d3..050ddd4 100644
--- a/include/linux/smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static inline void call_function_init(void) { }
/*
* Call a function on all processors
*/
-int on_each_cpu(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait);
+void on_each_cpu(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait);
/*
* Mark the boot cpu "online" so that it can call console drivers in
@@ -126,12 +126,11 @@ static inline int up_smp_call_function(smp_call_func_t func, void *info)
#define smp_call_function(func, info, wait) \
(up_smp_call_function(func, info))
#define on_each_cpu(func,info,wait) \
- ({ \
+ { \
local_irq_disable(); \
func(info); \
local_irq_enable(); \
- 0; \
- })
+ }
static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { }
#define num_booting_cpus() 1
#define smp_prepare_boot_cpu() do {} while (0)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index db197d6..f66a1b2 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -687,17 +687,15 @@ void __init smp_init(void)
* early_boot_irqs_disabled is set. Use local_irq_save/restore() instead
* of local_irq_disable/enable().
*/
-int on_each_cpu(void (*func) (void *info), void *info, int wait)
+void on_each_cpu(void (*func) (void *info), void *info, int wait)
{
unsigned long flags;
- int ret = 0;
preempt_disable();
- ret = smp_call_function(func, info, wait);
+ smp_call_function(func, info, wait);
local_irq_save(flags);
func(info);
local_irq_restore(flags);
preempt_enable();
- return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu);
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value
2012-01-03 14:19 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value Gilad Ben-Yossef
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-03 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] smp: refactor on_each_cpu to void returning func Gilad Ben-Yossef
@ 2012-01-03 14:25 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-01-03 16:08 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-01-06 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michal Nazarewicz @ 2012-01-03 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, Gilad Ben-Yossef
Cc: David Airlie, dri-devel, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras,
Grant Likely, Rob Herring, linuxppc-dev, devicetree-discuss,
Richard Henderson, Ivan Kokshaysky, Matt Turner, linux-alpha,
Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Tony Luck,
Fenghua Yu, linux-ia64, Will Deacon, Peter Zijlstra,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Russell King, linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:19:04 +0100, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> wrote:
> on_each_cpu() returns as its own return value the return value of
> smp_call_function(). smp_call_function() in turn returns a hard
> coded value of zero.
>
> Some callers to on_each_cpu() waste cycles and bloat code space
> by checking the return value to on_each_cpu(), probably for
> historical reasons.
>
> This patch set refactors callers to not test on_each_cpu()
> (fixed) return value and then refactors on_each_cpu to
> return void to avoid confusing future users.
>
> In other words, this patch aims to delete 18 source code lines
> while not changing any functionality :-)
>
> I tested as best as I could the x86 changes and compiled some
> of the others, but I don't have access to all the needed hardware
> for testing. Reviewers and testers welcome!
Other then the lack of Signed-off-by in the patches, looks good to me,
even though personally I'd choose a bottom-up approach, ie. make
smp_call_function() return void and from that conclude that
on_each_cpu() can return void. With those patches, we have a situation,
where smp_call_function() has a return value which is then lost for no
immediately apparent reason lost in on_each_cpu().
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value
2012-01-03 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value Michal Nazarewicz
@ 2012-01-03 16:08 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef @ 2012-01-03 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Nazarewicz
Cc: linux-kernel, David Airlie, dri-devel, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Paul Mackerras, Grant Likely, Rob Herring, linuxppc-dev,
devicetree-discuss, Richard Henderson, Ivan Kokshaysky,
Matt Turner, linux-alpha, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
H. Peter Anvin, x86, Tony Luck, Fenghua Yu, linux-ia64,
Will Deacon, Peter Zijlstra, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Russell King, linux-arm-kernel
2012/1/3 Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:19:04 +0100, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> on_each_cpu() returns as its own return value the return value of
>> smp_call_function(). smp_call_function() in turn returns a hard
>> coded value of zero.
>>
>> Some callers to on_each_cpu() waste cycles and bloat code space
>> by checking the return value to on_each_cpu(), probably for
>> historical reasons.
>>
>> This patch set refactors callers to not test on_each_cpu()
>> (fixed) return value and then refactors on_each_cpu to
>> return void to avoid confusing future users.
>>
>> In other words, this patch aims to delete 18 source code lines
>> while not changing any functionality :-)
>>
>> I tested as best as I could the x86 changes and compiled some
>> of the others, but I don't have access to all the needed hardware
>> for testing. Reviewers and testers welcome!
>
>
> Other then the lack of Signed-off-by in the patches, looks good to me,
Blimey! I'll resend with a proper Signed-off-by after more people have
a chance to
comment. And thanks for the review.
> even though personally I'd choose a bottom-up approach, ie. make
> smp_call_function() return void and from that conclude that
> on_each_cpu() can return void. With those patches, we have a situation,
> where smp_call_function() has a return value which is then lost for no
> immediately apparent reason lost in on_each_cpu().
There are so many call site of smp_call_function() that do not check the
return value right now that I think we can tolerate it for just a
little bit longer
until that get fixed as well... :-)
Thanks,
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
gilad@benyossef.com
Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388
US Cell: +1-973-8260388
http://benyossef.com
"Unfortunately, cache misses are an equal opportunity pain provider."
-- Mike Galbraith, LKML
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value
2012-01-03 14:19 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value Gilad Ben-Yossef
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-03 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value Michal Nazarewicz
@ 2012-01-06 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-08 16:10 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2012-01-06 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef
Cc: linux-ia64, David Airlie, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Will Deacon,
dri-devel, Grant Likely, Paul Mackerras, H. Peter Anvin,
Russell King, x86, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Matt Turner, Fenghua Yu, devicetree-discuss, Michal Nazarewicz,
Ivan Kokshaysky, Rob Herring, Thomas Gleixner, linux-arm-kernel,
Richard Henderson, Tony Luck, linux-kernel, linux-alpha,
linuxppc-dev
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 16:19 +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> on_each_cpu() returns as its own return value the return value of
> smp_call_function(). smp_call_function() in turn returns a hard
> coded value of zero.
>
> Some callers to on_each_cpu() waste cycles and bloat code space
> by checking the return value to on_each_cpu(), probably for
> historical reasons.
hysterical raisins,, yumm! :-)
> This patch set refactors callers to not test on_each_cpu()
> (fixed) return value and then refactors on_each_cpu to
> return void to avoid confusing future users.
>
Seems sane enough, fwiw:
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Remove useless on_each_cpu return value
2012-01-06 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2012-01-08 16:10 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef @ 2012-01-08 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: linux-kernel, Michal Nazarewicz, David Airlie, dri-devel,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Grant Likely, Rob Herring,
linuxppc-dev, devicetree-discuss, Richard Henderson,
Ivan Kokshaysky, Matt Turner, linux-alpha, Thomas Gleixner,
Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Tony Luck, Fenghua Yu,
linux-ia64, Will Deacon, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Russell King,
linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 16:19 +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>> on_each_cpu() returns as its own return value the return value of
>> smp_call_function(). smp_call_function() in turn returns a hard
>> coded value of zero.
>>
>> Some callers to on_each_cpu() waste cycles and bloat code space
>> by checking the return value to on_each_cpu(), probably for
>> historical reasons.
>
> hysterical raisins,, yumm! :-)
>
>> This patch set refactors callers to not test on_each_cpu()
>> (fixed) return value and then refactors on_each_cpu to
>> return void to avoid confusing future users.
>>
>
> Seems sane enough, fwiw:
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Thanks for the review :-)
I just sent out a V2. No changes except I've added the needed signed-off-by.
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
gilad@benyossef.com
Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388
US Cell: +1-973-8260388
http://benyossef.com
"Unfortunately, cache misses are an equal opportunity pain provider."
-- Mike Galbraith, LKML
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread