From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] pinctrl: add dt binding support for pinmux mappings Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:05:15 +0800 Message-ID: <20120110130511.GA26599@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1324402840-32451-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <1324402840-32451-3-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF176BE92F00@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <7FE21149F4667147B645348EC6057885075542@039-SN2MPN1-013.039d.mgd.msft.net> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF176CC743EF@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17761F18F8@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <7FE21149F4667147B645348EC605788507F698@039-SN2MPN1-013.039d.mgd.msft.net> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF177EE39E6B@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <7FE21149F4667147B645348EC605788508AC65@039-SN2MPN1-013.039d.mgd.msft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7FE21149F4667147B645348EC605788508AC65@039-SN2MPN1-013.039d.mgd.msft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dong Aisheng-B29396 Cc: Stephen Warren , Dong Aisheng , "linus.walleij@stericsson.com" , "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "cjb@laptop.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:21:05AM +0000, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote: > Here what I wonder is that do we need to allow the platform to use a func-name > property in their pinmux func node or pinmux group node to specify the name. I do not see the necessity. > If it is allowed, then it could be flexible for soc to define their names. > If not there may be limitations on their node names since we can only get it from > the node name. To me, the node name is perfectly fine to be used for that purpose. -- Regards, Shawn