Re: [GIT PULL] devicetree changes for v3.3

[Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>]

On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 12:41:25PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > Please pull the following device tree changes queued up for 3.3.
> >
> > There is a signed tag for this pull request: devicetree-for-linus-20120104
> >
> > The following changes since commit 805a6af8dba5dfdd35ec35dc52ec0122400b2610:
> >
> >  Linux 3.2 (2012-01-04 15:55:44 -0800)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >  git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 devicetree/merge
> 
> Ok, so I pulled the tags, but only because I noticed that you mentioned it.
> 
> It would have been much more convenient if you had just named the tag
> in the pull request directly, so that it would have said
> 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >  git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 devicetree-for-linus-20120104
> 
> and then my normal "cut-and-paste the pull request line" JustWorks(tm).
> 
> Of course, since you use those ugly tag names, I then end up editing
> the first line so that the shortlog doesn't fill up with random crud,
> so I'd actually prefer for the tag-name to not have that silly date in
> it. The tag itself is dated, so the date information actually does
> exist inside of it - and if I pull the signed tag, it will then exist
> hidden in the merge too (and can be shown using the new "git show
> --show-signature" thing):

Okay, will do.

g.