From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] devicetree changes for v3.3 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:21:42 -0700 Message-ID: <20120116162142.GE4223@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: devicetree-discuss List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 12:41:25PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Grant Likely = wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > > > Please pull the following device tree changes queued up for 3.3. > > > > There is a signed tag for this pull request: devicetree-for-linus-20120= 104 > > > > The following changes since commit 805a6af8dba5dfdd35ec35dc52ec0122400b= 2610: > > > > =A0Linux 3.2 (2012-01-04 15:55:44 -0800) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > =A0git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 devicetree/merge > = > Ok, so I pulled the tags, but only because I noticed that you mentioned i= t. > = > It would have been much more convenient if you had just named the tag > in the pull request directly, so that it would have said > = > > are available in the git repository at: > > =A0git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 devicetree-for-linus-20120104 > = > and then my normal "cut-and-paste the pull request line" JustWorks(tm). > = > Of course, since you use those ugly tag names, I then end up editing > the first line so that the shortlog doesn't fill up with random crud, > so I'd actually prefer for the tag-name to not have that silly date in > it. The tag itself is dated, so the date information actually does > exist inside of it - and if I pull the signed tag, it will then exist > hidden in the merge too (and can be shown using the new "git show > --show-signature" thing): Okay, will do. g.