From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] cpufreq: add arm soc generic cpufreq driver Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:51:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20120118205143.GL4223@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1324031462-24961-1-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org> <1324031462-24961-2-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org> <20120118113949.GA22977@sirena.org.uk> <20120118114228.GB22977@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120118114228.GB22977@sirena.org.uk> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Richard Zhao , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com, patches@linaro.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, eric.miao@linaro.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, davej@redhat.com, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:42:28AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:39:50AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > This appears to reintroduce the setting of an exact voltage which I'm > > sure was fixed in previous versions of the patch. > > Erk, sorry - it looks like the device tree list has quite a bit of lag > in moderation and sent out some old patches which I didn't notice. All > this has been fixed in subsequent verisons. Yeah, that's my fault. I'm rather a bursty moderator at times. g.