From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] i2c/gpio-i2c add: add DT support Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 20:15:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20120206201552.153eba5d@endymion.delvare> References: <1328438337-21185-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <4F301E25.5060507@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F301E25.5060507-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Karol Lewandowski Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:38:29 +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote: > On 05.02.2012 11:38, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > Hi! > > > +Device-Tree bindings for i2c gpio driver > > + > > +Required properties: > > + - compatible = "gpio-i2c"; > > Driver name is "i2c-gpio" in file i2c-gpio.c. Previous version of patch > adding DT-support (prepared by Thomas Chou[1]) used i2c-gpio - could we > stick to that name? > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/23/584 Yes, please. The gpio subsystem normalized its driver names to gpio-*, so we shouldn't use that anywhere else to avoid confusion. -- Jean Delvare