From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initial Device Tree system for Snowball Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 02:09:51 +0000 Message-ID: <201203030209.51767.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> References: <1330703567-17925-1-git-send-email-niklas.hernaeus@stericsson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1330703567-17925-1-git-send-email-niklas.hernaeus@stericsson.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Niklas Hernaeus , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Thomas Espersson , Lee Jones , Niklas Hernaeus List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Friday 02 March 2012, Niklas Hernaeus wrote: > > From: Niklas Hernaeus > > This is the base system for using Device Tree for Snowball. > The new boardfile is a slightly modified copy of the original board file, > so new Device Tree stuff can simply be added and code removed, while > functionality stays the same. I realized that this series is based on a version before Lee's patches to add the soc information, and things have changed quite a bit with that. I've played a bit more with this and tried to merge the two, the result is a series in the testing/ux500/dt branch of arm-soc.git. I'm sure it's not actually all correct, but I've tried my best there and also added quite a bit of device tree source for illustration. Maybe the two of you can have a look there and see what you can make of it. Arnd