Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ARM: imx28: add basic dt support

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

Dear Dong Aisheng,

> From: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> 
> This patch includes basic dt support which can boot via nfs rootfs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
>  * Some fixes addressed Rob's review comments.
>    Remove using of OF_DEV_AUXDATA.
>  * Remove mac address from dts file
>    Currently we use the mac address got from uboot to work.
>    Will submit a p separate atch using prom_update_property to fix this
>    issue for driver based on suggestions from Grant and Lothar.
>  * rename mxs-dt.c to mach-mxs.c which is supposed to support mx23 dt
>    too in the future.
>  * add compatible string "fsl,imx28" per Sascha's suggestion
>  * add more devices in dtsi file
>    For those devices still not in use, set the state to "disabled"
>    by default.
> 
> For other patches i sent with this in the first series like mmc and sdma
> dt support, i will send out them separately since this patch does not
> depend on them and does not block you to run dt via nfs rootfs.
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt |    4 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts               |   35 +++

Isn't this supposed to be "mx28evk.dts"?

>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi                  |  358
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig                     | 
>   8 +
>  arch/arm/mach-mxs/Makefile                    |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c                |    4 +
>  arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c                  |   69 +++++
>  7 files changed, 479 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt index 54bddda..9f21faf
> 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.txt
> @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
>  Freescale i.MX Platforms Device Tree Bindings
>  -----------------------------------------------
> 
> +i.MX28 Evaluation Kit
> +Required root node properties:
> +    - compatible = "fsl,imx28-evk", "fsl,imx28";
> +
>  i.MX51 Babbage Board
>  Required root node properties:
>      - compatible = "fsl,imx51-babbage", "fsl,imx51";
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5402495
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public
> + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * Version 2 or later at the following locations:
> + *
> + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html
> + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +/include/ "imx28.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> +	model = "Freescale i.MX28 Evaluation Kit";
> +	compatible = "fsl,imx28-evk", "fsl,imx28";
> +
> +	memory {
> +		device_type = "memory";
> +		reg = <0x40000000 0x08000000>;
> +	};
> +
> +	ahb@80080000 {
> +		ethernet@800f0000 {

fec@... would be more readable, but I think this was decided before to be like 
this?

> +			phy-mode = "rmii";
> +			status = "okay";
> +		};
> +

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Makefile
> index 908bf9a..8328c45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Makefile
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += pm.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX23) += clock-mx23.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX28) += clock-mx28.o
> 
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MXS_DT) += mach-mxs.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_STMP378X_DEVB) += mach-stmp378x_devb.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MX23EVK) += mach-mx23evk.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MX28EVK) += mach-mx28evk.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c index 5d68e41..88ed30c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
> @@ -671,6 +671,10 @@ static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = {
>  	_REGISTER_CLOCK("imx28-fb", NULL, lcdif_clk)
>  	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-saif.0", NULL, saif0_clk)
>  	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-saif.1", NULL, saif1_clk)
> +	/* for DT */
> +	_REGISTER_CLOCK("80074000.serial", NULL, uart_clk)
> +	_REGISTER_CLOCK("800f0000.ethernet", NULL, fec_clk)
> +	_REGISTER_CLOCK("800f4000.ethernet", NULL, fec_clk)

Wasn't the DT stuff supposed to be more symbolic? Aka. this seems weird.

>  };
> 
>  static int clk_misc_init(void)

Best regards,