From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] ARM: at91: dt: remove unit-address part for memory nodes Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:17:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20120404191754.GE10603@quad.lixom.net> References: <1db62b280314855c35cb7a3188fc9d9cb8501948.1333437885.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1db62b280314855c35cb7a3188fc9d9cb8501948.1333437885.git.nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-usb-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:32:57AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches > > Having a unit-address different from 0 causes bad memory node detection > during early_init_dt_scan_memory. Sounds like a bug in the generic code to me? But specifying a unit address on a non-ambiguous device node isn't necessary anyway, so this patch is still a reasonable thing to do. > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Acked-by: Olof Johansson -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html