From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] staging: iio: light: of: Fix vendor prefix of isl29018/isl29028 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:49:12 -0700 Message-ID: <20120423174912.GA3214@kroah.com> References: <1335183097-21104-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1335183097-21104-4-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <4F958E9F.8070402@wwwdotorg.org> <20120423172829.GA2666@kroah.com> <4F9594DB.5070308@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F9594DB.5070308-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-iio-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Laxman Dewangan , grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org, rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org, jic23-KWPb1pKIrIJaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org, swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:43:55AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/23/2012 11:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:17:19AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 04/23/2012 06:11 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >>> ISL29018/ISL29028 is from Intersil Corporation and making the > >>> vendor prefix for this part as "isil" for OF compatibity. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan > >> > >> I assume this patch will go through the staging tree. Let me know if you > >> want me to take it through the Tegra tree. > > > > Please take it through the Tegra tree, it is probably easier overall > > that way: > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Sorry, looking harder, this patch touches a file that's added in the > current staging tree, so I can't take this patch. > > There aren't any dependencies between this patch and the others due to > the way I2C probing works (the OF vendor prefix ends up getting > ignored), so I think merging it into staging should be simple. Ok, I'll do that, Laxman, can you resend it to me? thanks, greg k-h