From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] ARM: tegra: Add AHB driver Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:47:36 +0000 Message-ID: <201204301447.36246.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1335352072-4001-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <20120426215903.GH24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120427084015.cb7c8e00c7d9a4cd01faa5ae@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120427084015.cb7c8e00c7d9a4cd01faa5ae-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hiroshi Doyu Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Stephen Warren , Stephen Warren , "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Felipe Balbi , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Friday 27 April 2012, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > What about having this driver under "drivers/amba"? > > If other similiar drivers are coming up, it's easy to find rather than > having this arch/arm/mach-*. There may be some possibility of > generalization later, then. Also it meets the requirement of no > "struct xxxx_driver" under arch/arm. Arnd? I'm fine with either drivers/amba (arguing that it's for a specific amba bus even if it's highly platform specific) or arch/arm/mach-tegra (arguing that it's platform code and not actually a device driver even if it appears like one). If Russell doesn't mind having it in drivers/amba, I'd say we should go for that. Arnd