devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
	lrg@ti.com, rob.herring@calxeda.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, lee.jones@linaro.org,
	swarren@wwwdotorg.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] regulator: dt: regulator match by regulator-compatible
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:15:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120620231546.GB4037@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201206202040.52291.arnd@arndb.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1925 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:40:52PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> But that sounds more like what the "reg" property does than what
> the "compatible" property does for other devices. In other words, you
> want to know which instance you are describing, not what kind of
> object it is.

No, it's describing the kind of object.  This stuff is for devices which
throw a bunch of irregular regulators down on a chip with no particular
similarity with each other.

> For a "compatible" property, I would expect two objects that have
> the same register-level interface but are responsible for different
> physical objects to have the same "compatible" values, but here
> you specifically need distinct "regulator-compatible" values.

There's nothing stopping a driver drilling down deeper with other data
once it's worked out what it's talking about, if it wants to read an
additional id value or base register that's absolutely fine and probably
even a good idea.  The problem is that for a lot of hardware there's
just a bunch of random irregular devices.

> It makes much more sense now, so please let's make sure that explanation
> ends up in the changelog.

To be honest I just don't care, the old code hasn't been around for long
enough or widely adopted enough for anyone to care and it's just more
brain cycles gone.

> * What is the difference between "regulator-name" and
> "regulator-compatible"? Those are the same most of the time
> in the patches, so can't we just make sure they are always the
> same, and drop the confusingly named "regulator-compatible" one?

As the binding documentation says the former is a display name for use
so people can tell what the software is talking about, for example the
name the supply has in the schematic.  It's completely up to the user
and the regulator driver can't use it for anything except printing so it
needs something else to help it figure out what it's working with.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-20 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-20 12:23 [PATCH V3 0/3] regulator: dt: add policy to match regulator with prop "regulator-compatible" Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-20 12:23 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] ARM: dts: db8500: add property "regulator-compatible" regulator node Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-20 18:48   ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-20 12:23 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] regulator: dt: regulator match by regulator-compatible Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-20 19:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-06-20 19:46     ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 19:51       ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-20 23:37         ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 20:40       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-06-20 21:01         ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-20 23:35           ` Mark Brown
2012-06-21 14:50             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-06-21 16:14               ` Mark Brown
2012-06-21 17:17                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-06-21 17:31                   ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-21 21:03                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-06-21 22:52                       ` Mark Brown
2012-06-21 19:45                   ` Mark Brown
     [not found]                     ` <20120621194544.GZ4037-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-21 21:53                       ` Mitch Bradley
2012-06-21 22:36                         ` Mark Brown
2012-06-20 23:15         ` Mark Brown [this message]
     [not found]       ` <20120620194609.GA4037-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-22  6:13         ` Thierry Reding
2012-06-22  8:42           ` Mark Brown
2012-06-22  8:59             ` Thierry Reding
2012-06-22  9:12               ` Mark Brown
2012-06-26  9:02                 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-26  9:12                   ` Mark Brown
2012-06-26 10:13                     ` Lee Jones
2012-07-04 23:48                       ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-05  7:16                         ` Lee Jones
2012-06-20 12:23 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] regulator: dt: add policy to have property "regulator-compatible" Laxman Dewangan
2012-06-20 18:52   ` Stephen Warren
2012-07-03 19:25   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-04  7:03     ` Laxman Dewangan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120620231546.GB4037@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).