Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: fixed: dt: support for input supply

[Mark Brown <broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 958 bytes --]

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 04:12:53PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 July 2012 03:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:32:08PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> >>In non-DT, the input supply is passed with the regulator_init_data
> >>through the fixed voltage config and it is filled in board files.

> >No, this is a legacy way of doing things.  All regulators should be
> >moving to specifying the name in their descriptor except for supplies
> >that are power roots (which are often fixed voltage regulators).

> Then the input_supply should be set through the regulator init data
> "init_data->supply_regulator" rather than the desc? If yes then also
> I need to change the forthcoming patch for tps65910 and tps6586x to
> pass the supply_regulator through init_data.

No, exactly the opposite way round - it should be being set in the
descriptor.  The issue with your patch was that it only allowed DT
systems to do this.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss