devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@linaro.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:00:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120716130015.GF17435@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5003FB7C.4030509@linaro.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 975 bytes --]

> >What I am afraid of is: tentative solutions tend to stay, because the
> >need for a proper solution is reduced. Yet, finding proper generic
> >bindings might take some time which doesn't meet the high pressure
> >around DT at the moment.
> 
> I agree with what you say to some extent, but I believe that it is
> more important to have a working solution now than to ensure that
> each bindings are as unique as possible. After any suggestion of
> consolidation, a move from vendor specific to generically defined
> Device Tree bindings is trivial. Especially in the current stage
> where adaptions and definitions are still fluid.

See my response to Linus. I do understand your view and where it comes
from. As a maintainer, I have other priorities. No offence involved,
it needs some settlement.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-16 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20120710164130.f38e4d1673f925ddb13914c9@canb.auug.org.au>
     [not found] ` <20120712131231.GH2194@pengutronix.de>
     [not found]   ` <20120712131231.GH2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-14 21:34     ` linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 10:17       ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 11:31         ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 13:00           ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-07-16 13:55             ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:06           ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 13:30             ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:35               ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:02                 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 14:22                   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:52                     ` Lee Jones
     [not found]                       ` <50057C1A.80606-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-17 15:20                         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18  5:33                           ` Shawn Guo
2012-07-18  9:59                             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:29                               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 10:33                                 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:43                                   ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18  7:35                           ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 11:12                             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 11:24                               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 11:37         ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 12:35           ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found]             ` <20120716123550.GE17435-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-16 19:45               ` Linus Walleij
     [not found]                 ` <CACRpkdaMB-n7XYcxE8QtAm-WrGc2DR0krfTjQZCbvOL1HYep1Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-16 20:04                   ` Chris Ball
2012-07-17 13:10             ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120716130015.GF17435@pengutronix.de \
    --to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=dsaxena@linaro.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=rubini@gnudd.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).