From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Gyungoh Yoo <jack.yoo@maxim-ic.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: add MAX8907 core driver
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:16:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120726221604.GL4560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5011BF90.5030708@wwwdotorg.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1898 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:07:12PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 02:35 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:40:30PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> + if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(d)) {
> >> + /* 1 -- disable, 0 -- enable */
> >> + switch (irq_data->mask_reg) {
> > This loop we should just port over into the regmap code.
> I assume the best way of doing this is to add new functions
> regmap_irq_suspend()/regmap_irq_resume() (which would mask any enabled
> interrupts that were not wake enabled); that way, the regmap_irq code
> can loop over each register and just write it once. An alternative might
> be to implement struct irq_chip's .irq_suspend/.irq_resume ops, but that
> might worst-case end up with an I2C write per interrupt.
irq_suspend() and irq_resume() are only supposed to be called once per
irq_chip so there should be no concern with using them. Even if they
weren't it's probably not that performance critical really.
> I see that the MAX8907 IRQ code does this in suspend:
> if (device_may_wakeup(chip->dev))
> enable_irq_wake(i2c->irq);
> else
> disable_irq(i2c->irq);
> and this in resume:
> if (device_may_wakeup(chip->dev))
> disable_irq_wake(i2c->irq);
> else
> enable_irq(i2c->irq);
> neither of which are done in regmap_irq, since it doesn't explicitly do
> anything for suspend/resume at the moment. Are those code blocks
> necessary? I see that regmap_irq_sync_unlock() is already calling
> irq_set_irq_wake(), which implies that suspend/resume may have already
> been completely taken care of?
Yes, it should already be taken care of. What the calls here are doing
is mostly allowing userspace to explicitly override the wake state on a
per chip basis. I'm not convinced it's terribly clever to implement
explicit wake support on an interrupt controller, it seems prone to
confusion. We could do that though.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-26 19:40 [PATCH] mfd: add MAX8907 core driver Stephen Warren
2012-07-26 20:35 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20120726203526.GD4560-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-26 21:14 ` Stephen Warren
2012-07-26 21:51 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-26 22:07 ` Stephen Warren
2012-07-26 22:16 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-07-27 6:36 ` Laxman Dewangan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-01 20:48 Stephen Warren
2012-08-02 16:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-02 17:11 ` Stephen Warren
2012-08-02 17:56 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120726221604.GL4560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=jack.yoo@maxim-ic.com \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).