From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] runtime interpreted power sequences Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:23:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20120731142313.GU4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1343390750-3642-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1343390750-3642-2-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <50179933.9090501@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50179933.9090501@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Courbot Cc: Simon Glass , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:37:07PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > On 07/30/2012 08:00 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > >For the delay, I think milliseconds is reasonable. I suppose there is > >no reasonable need for microseconds? > I don't see any need for microseconds myself - anybody sees use for > finer-grained delays? Bouncing reset lines, often the time required for reset is down in the microseconds.