From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: Device tree node names Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:36:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20120817113610.GB32216@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <502D4B28.4020108@wwwdotorg.org> <502D67DF.7010605@firmworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <502D67DF.7010605-D5eQfiDGL7eakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Mitch Bradley Cc: devicetree-discuss , Rob Herring , Alexandre Courbot List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:36:31AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote: > The main "rule" for node names is that a user browsing the device tree > can easily determine what something is. Thus "ethernet" instead of > "DEC,21140". Does this actually buy us much? It seems like it's something that's much better addressed through comments in the device tree than with syntax.