Re: [PATCH REPOST] dtc: integrate gpp

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

On 16:26 Sat 25 Aug     , Stephen Warren wrote:
> 
> 
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> >On 22:11 Tue 21 Aug     , Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >> 
> >> I figured the easiest way to get named constants into dtc would be to
> >> re-use an existing C pre-processor implemntation. Surprisingly, I
> >could
> >> not find many /good/ possibilities for this. I eventually found one
> >called
> >> gpp. This patch is an extremely quick-and-dirty integration of gpp
> >into
> >> dtc in order to solicit some feedback. What do people think of this
> >> approach in general?
> >
> >I'm not sure it's rely the right way
> >
> >I does the support but we may just use gcc for as it's done for linker
> >script
> >but I will agree that with this dtc is standalone
> 
> A C-compiler's pre-processor gets confused by property names starting with #, which gpp at least can be configured not to (outside column 1 at least)
ok fine by me

Best Regards,
J.