From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] arm/dts: Add device tree data for AM33XX devices Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:01:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20120907170135.GY1303@atomide.com> References: <1346924304-27425-1-git-send-email-anilkumar@ti.com> <331ABD5ECB02734CA317220B2BBEABC13EA293E9@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <5049B245.9080807@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5049B245.9080807-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Benoit Cousson Cc: "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-leds-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "bryan.wu-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org" , "rpurdie-Fm38FmjxZ/leoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org" , "linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Koen Kooi , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Benoit Cousson [120907 01:38]: > Hi Anil, > > On 09/07/2012 07:30 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 15:08:21, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > >> Add pinctrl and d_can device tree data to AM33XX family of devices. > >> First two patches add support for pinctrl DT data and third one > >> adds dcan DT data. > >> > >> Reason behind combining these patches is to apply cleanly on > >> linux-omap tree, because these are sequential patches. > >>Yes, > >> These patches were tested on AM335x-Bone, AM335x-EVM and based > >> on linux-omap:master with this patch > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org/msg74393.html > >> > > > > If there are no changes in this patch series ACK from > > reviewers (esp. Tony, koen and Marc) will help. > > Yes, indeed. The series looks good to me, but it will be nice to get > some acks from people who commented previous revision. Acked two of them, but there's still some gpio-leds.c discussion going on that should be resolved first. Tony