From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Documentation: add description of DT binding for the gpio-mvebu driver Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:54:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20120914165408.4beaefe7@skate> References: <1347551658-24449-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1347551658-24449-3-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <50524026.20104@gmail.com> <20120913223059.2d0606b2@skate> <50524363.9070100@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Lior Amsalem , Andrew Lunn , Russell King , Jason Cooper , Stephen Warren , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Grant Likely , Maen Suleiman , Ben Dooks , Gregory CLEMENT , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linus Walleij List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Dear Linus Walleij, On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:17:09 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> Yes, I know, but MAINTAINERS does not mention an alternate maintainer > >> for the GPIO subsystem. Who is the interim maintainer that will > >> ultimately have to ack/nack those patches? > > > > Linus W. is. > > I stated Reviewed-by: on the GPIO patch, please merge it through the > Marvell tree (I guess that's the plan?) Yes, I guess it's the easiest plan (Jason ? Andrew ?). We however need Acks on the pinctrl patch series as well, since this one depends on it. Thanks a lot for your review! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com