From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Porter Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/2] of: Add generic device tree DMA helpers Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:40:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20120919144040.GC16522@beef> References: <1347662517-4210-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <1347662517-4210-2-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <20120919140705.GB16522@beef> <201209191424.56086.arnd@arndb.de> <5059D874.6040107@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5059D874.6040107@gmail.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Jon Hunter , device-tree , linux-omap , linux-arm , Nicolas Ferre , Benoit Cousson , Stephen Warren , Grant Likely , Russell King , Vinod Koul , Dan Williams List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:36:36AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/19/2012 09:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 September 2012, Matt Porter wrote: > >>> +Optional properties: > >>> +- #dma-channels: Number of DMA channels supported by the controller. > >>> +- #dma-requests: Number of DMA requests signals supported by the > >>> + controller. > >> > >> Shouldn't these two optional properties drop the prefix #? By > >> convention adopted from the various original OF/ePAPR/etc specs, the > >> only properties I would expect to see with this prefix are the > >> "*-cells" cell sizes. A quick search indicates this is the case > >> throughout all the current bindings. > > > > I always assumed that the # prefix is used to indicate that we are counting > > things instead of listing them. > > Lots of properties count things, but don't have a #. nr_gpios or spi > chipselect counts for example. I'd say drop the #. Ok, I can drop another trivial patch since I hear Jon is on vacation. Yeah, I grepped all the bindings and it's only ever encountered on cell sizes. There's not even one example of it used as above. -Matt