From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [Resend PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add device tree support Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 10:21:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20121107092124.GE12323@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1352259701-19847-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> <20121107084932.GE20063@game.jcrosoft.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121107084932.GE20063@game.jcrosoft.org> Sender: linux-sound-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: Bo Shen , nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:49:32AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > yes the pinctrl is mainline in -next via pinctrl tree > s code does not work on the DT kernel untill it's done > NACK stand I refuse this touch the at91 dtsi untiol it's done correctly ...and here's another mail (plus a further private mail on the same subject) by the time I managed to reply to the first one, the timestamps say in about ten minutes :/ What I'm seeing here is two of the Atmel maintainers disagreeing about a patch so I've got to pick one view and right now applying the patch looks like it moves us further forwards. Like I say it's not an issue right now and it seems like it should be trivial to fix. Is anything needed here other than adding the pinctrl_get_set_default() call, in which case would it not be less effort all round to just send the patch? If there is more involved then what is needed? Thinking about it a little more I'm actually wondering why whatever pinctrl change made this mandatory didn't go through and update all the drivers. --lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQmigNAAoJELSic+t+oim9S2AP/3VEl9akQMaE+NOglmg9wKDf 5IkGR9/vra0AYgzeTUHvH8uRstlwy7w8GjwyVfs8rhEwLCNw1qfgLXrhOB8fbD1/ aXa+UawRZ26yFSrKR6MxAOXl5IOAivyOYKz38ebffb+OO5C0jCSnk9ahC8zlBdjE KmEf5gBp1xtQEs3ospTkZ7kiLEePlDQ/HTujtqZ2xcEBJIVFWCHTnXOK099aVqcs SRakAxUsQ8tqd7iuDkTe9I50upF2tibeRzntSuIS3RET5j9BZrQyeGbSmoGNg7Xn OzeLGDtC7P8ip2mcEiKi/rSO5HrO6s9urv/v5FKHXqDe7hakqogPth4nzQgV6O8m kg3bC2ACYQ/LdHRt+EeMuKmntkrU18pbuQUqjT2D8Pv7TEp3cdKOrh5xVWc1GrF0 yh0VGM3SvGvMjqXsYUJriMu5I10n/MCv55E001rPIXLGmDWP8+HtzkyA1C5lhTk6 ChuZpF+ZiT05EFrWeRLs0TBN4i1eEWHzI5v9eWDYiCkQCTV43uZ7lrXcnnyHR10L RxCcLrAK3Gt2w5+vbalxp03Ry9XGxij8gCNQFxYCX1bVGWPIxvIocizropCTVFyz wV4Iv5KNlqXltIMoQ9QjYI6jUB4TFtAiipFxMjYA+PmVXM9k6qCnhsnSpk/kK8Su t4q1AxcpRc8UQvbeKFog =5Z76 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl--