From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] ARM: kernel: add device tree init map function
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 10:23:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121107102349.GC17831@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121106215044.GB21764@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi Will,
thanks for the review on the series.
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:50:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:21:45PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > When booting through a device tree, the kernel cpu logical id map can be
> > initialized using device tree data passed by FW or through an embedded blob.
> >
> > This patch adds a function that parses device tree "cpu" nodes and
> > retrieves the corresponding CPUs hardware identifiers (MPIDR).
> > It sets the possible cpus and the cpu logical map values according to
> > the number of CPUs defined in the device tree and respective properties.
> >
> > The primary CPU is assigned cpu logical number 0 to keep the current
> > convention valid.
> >
> > Current bindings documentation is included in the patch:
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>
> [...]
>
> > +void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *dn = NULL;
> > + int i, cpu = 1;
> > +
> > + while ((dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, "cpu")) && cpu <= nr_cpu_ids) {
> > + const u32 *hwid;
> > + int len;
> > +
> > + pr_debug(" * %s...\n", dn->full_name);
> > +
> > + hwid = of_get_property(dn, "reg", &len);
> > +
> > + if (!hwid || len != 4) {
> > + pr_err(" * %s missing reg property\n", dn->full_name);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + /*
> > + * We want to assign the boot CPU logical id 0.
> > + * Boot CPU checks its own MPIDR and if matches the current
> > + * cpu node "reg" value it sets the logical cpu index to 0
> > + * and stores the physical id accordingly.
> > + * If MPIDR does not match, assign sequential cpu logical
> > + * id (starting from 1) and increments it.
> > + */
> > + i = (be32_to_cpup(hwid) == (read_cpuid_mpidr() & 0xffffff))
> > + ? 0 : cpu++;
> > +
> > + if (!i)
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "Booting Linux on CPU HWID 0x%x\n",
> > + be32_to_cpup(hwid));
>
> I don't think we should bother with this print -- we already print something
> in smp_setup_processor_id, which cannot differ for the boot CPU, If you want
> the full mpidr, we could change that code to include it as well.
Yes, it is duplicate code, I will remove it. Extending the printk in
smp_setup_processor_id() to include the entire MPIDR should be done
though, otherwise we might have printk aliases on system with multiple
clusters.
>
> We might also want some sanity checking that we do indeed end up with
> logical id 0 for the boot CPU. If not, I think we should scream and fall
> back on the simple mapping created earlier.
Well, this basically means that we have to make sure this function is
executed on the boot CPU (and it is as the code stands now), right ?
Since we are reading the MPIDR of the CPU parsing the tree and assign logical
cpu 0 accordingly I think we have this check carried out automatically,
unless for any given reason someone calls this function on a CPU that is
not the boot one (Why ?).
Basically I could add a check like:
if (WARN_ON(smp_processor_id())
return;
to fall back to the previous mapping, but that's overkill IMHO.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-07 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 13:21 [RFC PATCH 0/4] ARM: multi-cluster aware boot protocol Lorenzo Pieralisi
2012-10-16 13:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] ARM: kernel: add device tree init map function Lorenzo Pieralisi
[not found] ` <1350393709-23546-2-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-16 20:42 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-17 10:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2012-11-06 21:50 ` Will Deacon
2012-11-07 10:23 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
[not found] ` <20121107102349.GC17831-7AyDDHkRsp3ZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-07 11:05 ` Will Deacon
2012-11-07 12:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
[not found] ` <20121107120052.GD17831-7AyDDHkRsp3ZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-07 15:35 ` Will Deacon
2012-11-07 17:43 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2012-10-16 13:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] ARM: kernel: add cpu logical map DT init in setup_arch Lorenzo Pieralisi
[not found] ` <1350393709-23546-3-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-06 21:52 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-16 13:21 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] ARM: kernel: add logical mappings look-up Lorenzo Pieralisi
[not found] ` <1350393709-23546-4-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-06 22:00 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-16 13:21 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] ARM: gic: use a private mapping for CPU target interfaces Lorenzo Pieralisi
[not found] ` <1350393709-23546-5-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-06 22:16 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <20121106221651.GE21764-MRww78TxoiP5vMa5CHWGZ34zcgK1vI+I0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-06 22:59 ` Nicolas Pitre
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.02.1211061755260.21033-QuJgVwGFrdf/9pzu0YdTqQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-07 10:23 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <20121107102357.GD23305-MRww78TxoiP5vMa5CHWGZ34zcgK1vI+I0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-07 15:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121107102349.GC17831@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Pawel.Moll@arm.com \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dave.martin@linaro.org \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).