From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
device-tree <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: OMAP: Timer and Counter DT Updates for v3.8
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 09:38:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121108173824.GE6801@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509BE9B0.5040608@ti.com>
* Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> [121108 09:21]:
>
> On 11/07/2012 05:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> That's a bugger. I completely missed your patch last week sorry (I will blame the Danish
> beer) and had clearly not folded in to my testing!
:)
> > I guess we should apply the following fix somewhere or
> > do we need to check other places too?
>
> I will re-test your master branch today and put it through my dmtimer tests to double check.
> However, in general I did ensure that we checked pdata was not NULL before accessing when
> I introduced the dt stuff. In my changelog [1] I had ...
>
> "5. When device-tree is present the platform_data structure will be NULL and so check for
> this."
>
> I just need to make sure that get_context_loss_count() is not called before checking it is
> populated.
OK
> > +
> > + if (pdata) {
> > + timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability;
>
> You don't need this it is already handled a few lines before.
>
> > + timer->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count;
>
> We could probably move this too. For example ...
OK yeah makes sense to me.
Regards,
Tony
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
> index 38c12ef..9dca23e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c
> @@ -799,12 +799,11 @@ static int __devinit omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> timer->id = pdev->id;
> timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability;
> timer->reserved = omap_dm_timer_reserved_systimer(timer->id);
> + timer->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count;
> }
>
> timer->irq = irq->start;
> timer->pdev = pdev;
> - timer->capability = pdata->timer_capability;
> - timer->get_context_loss_count = pdata->get_context_loss_count;
>
> /* Skip pm_runtime_enable for OMAP1 */
> if (!(timer->capability & OMAP_TIMER_NEEDS_RESET)) {
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135065877008624&w=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-08 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-02 18:59 [GIT PULL] ARM: OMAP: Timer and Counter DT Updates for v3.8 Jon Hunter
2012-11-07 0:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-07 23:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-08 17:19 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-08 17:38 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-11-08 19:47 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-09 0:18 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-09 22:00 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121108173824.GE6801@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).