From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dtc/libfdt: sparse fixes Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:23:03 +1100 Message-ID: <20121114102303.GF32290@truffula.fritz.box> References: <20121113183430.472a0d989815fbd73ee9b437@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121113183430.472a0d989815fbd73ee9b437-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Kim Phillips Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hrm. The patch comment shows a lot of sparse warnings, but the patch looks like the basic conversion of the code from uint32_t to annontated fdt32_t types. I also never saw a 3/4. Has something gone wrong with the patch sending? -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson