devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] ARM: kernel: add device tree init map function
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:54:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121119135418.GB2816@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353329106-24084-5-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:45:03PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> When booting through a device tree, the kernel cpu logical id map can be
> initialized using device tree data passed by FW or through an embedded blob.
> 
> This patch adds a function that parses device tree "cpu" nodes and
> retrieves the corresponding CPUs hardware identifiers (MPIDR).
> It sets the possible cpus and the cpu logical map values according to
> the number of CPUs defined in the device tree and respective properties.
> 
> The device tree HW identifiers are considered valid if all CPU nodes contain
> a "reg" property, there are no duplicate "reg" entries and the DT defines a
> CPU node whose "reg" property matches the MPIDR[23:0] of the boot CPU.
> 
> The primary CPU is assigned cpu logical number 0 to keep the current convention
> valid.
> 
> Current bindings documentation is included in the patch:
> 
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt |  77 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/prom.h                    |   2 +
>  arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c                      | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 179 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..46c3589
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +* ARM CPUs binding description
> +
> +The device tree allows to describe the layout of CPUs in a system through
> +the "cpus" node, which in turn contains a number of subnodes (ie "cpu")
> +defining properties for every cpu.
> +
> +Bindings for CPU nodes follow the ePAPR standard, available from:
> +
> +http://devicetree.org
> +
> +For the ARM architecture every CPU node must contain the following properties:
> +
> +- device_type:	must be "cpu"
> +- reg:		property matching the CPU MPIDR[23:0] register bits
> +		reg[31:24] bits must be set to 0
> +- compatible:	should be one of:
> +		"arm,arm1020"
> +		"arm,arm1020e"
> +		"arm,arm1022"
> +		"arm,arm1026"
> +		"arm,arm720"
> +		"arm,arm740"
> +		"arm,arm7tdmi"
> +		"arm,arm920"
> +		"arm,arm922"
> +		"arm,arm925"
> +		"arm,arm926"
> +		"arm,arm940"
> +		"arm,arm946"
> +		"arm,arm9tdmi"
> +		"arm,cortex-a5"
> +		"arm,cortex-a7"
> +		"arm,cortex-a8"
> +		"arm,cortex-a9"
> +		"arm,cortex-a15"
> +		"arm,arm1136"
> +		"arm,arm1156"
> +		"arm,arm1176"
> +		"arm,arm11mpcore"
> +		"faraday,fa526"
> +		"intel,sa110"
> +		"intel,sa1100"
> +		"marvell,feroceon"
> +		"marvell,mohawk"
> +		"marvell,xsc3"
> +		"marvell,xscale"
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +	cpus {
> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +
> +		CPU0: cpu@0 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm, cortex-a15";
> +			reg = <0x0>;
> +		};
> +
> +		CPU1: cpu@1 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm, cortex-a15";
> +			reg = <0x1>;
> +		};
> +
> +		CPU2: cpu@100 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm, cortex-a7";
> +			reg = <0x100>;
> +		};
> +
> +		CPU3: cpu@101 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm, cortex-a7";
> +			reg = <0x101>;
> +		};
> +	};

Those spaces in the compatible strings shouldn't be there.

Otherwise, looks good to me.

Thanks,
Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-19 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-19 12:44 [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM: multi-cluster aware boot protocol Lorenzo Pieralisi
2012-11-19 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: kernel: enhance MPIDR macro definitions Lorenzo Pieralisi
     [not found]   ` <1353329106-24084-2-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-19 13:44     ` Will Deacon
2012-11-19 15:37     ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-11-19 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] ARM: kernel: update topology to use new MPIDR macros Lorenzo Pieralisi
     [not found]   ` <1353329106-24084-3-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-19 13:45     ` Will Deacon
2012-11-19 15:38     ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-11-19 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] ARM: kernel: smp_setup_processor_id() updates Lorenzo Pieralisi
     [not found]   ` <1353329106-24084-4-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-19 13:45     ` Will Deacon
2012-11-19 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] ARM: kernel: add device tree init map function Lorenzo Pieralisi
2012-11-19 13:54   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2012-11-19 14:07     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2012-11-19 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] ARM: kernel: add cpu logical map DT init in setup_arch Lorenzo Pieralisi
2012-11-19 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: kernel: add logical mappings look-up Lorenzo Pieralisi
2012-11-19 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: gic: use a private mapping for CPU target interfaces Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121119135418.GB2816@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Pawel.Moll@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dave.martin@linaro.org \
    --cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).