From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: stmpe: Add DT support for stmpe gpio Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:14:13 +0000 Message-ID: <20121123121413.GB22268@gmail.com> References: <912d88b8906ce87cf5459cf3d5798e03bfce34c7.1353649737.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20121123103400.GO17471@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spear-devel@list.st.com, Vipul Kumar Samar List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > >> - stmpe_gpio->chip.base =3D pdata ? pdata->gpio_base : -1; > > > > Why have you deleted this? > > > >> + > >> + if (pdata) { > >> + stmpe_gpio->norequest_mask =3D pdata->norequest_mask= ; > >> + stmpe_gpio->chip.base =3D pdata->gpio_base; > > > > Then added this? > > > >> + } else { > >> + stmpe_gpio->chip.base =3D -1; > > > > And this? >=20 > To group all non-DT assignments in a single if block, instead of two. That assignment has nothing to do with DT. > > Just leave the top line in and it saves you lots of complecations. >=20 > Sorry, Couldn't get this one. I'm saying, just leave it where it is. > >> + if (np) > >> + of_property_read_u32(np, "st,norequest-mask"= , > >> + &pdata->norequest_mask); > > > > Can you explain to me what this does? >=20 > You mean pdata->norequest_mask? It marks few gpios as unusable. > Because these pads might be used by other blocks of stmpe. I'm not sure if that should be set with DT or not. Second opinion anyone? --=20 Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog