From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/3] mfd: stmpe: Arrange #include
in alphabetical order Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:25:57 +0000 Message-ID: <20121126132557.GA6824@gmail.com> References: <57384ebc52c7d39d1bae31ba3baa6f820b4ac696.1353610436.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20121126111639.GR12685@sortiz-mobl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Samuel Ortiz , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spear-devel@list.st.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 26 November 2012 16:46, Samuel Ortiz wrote= : > > Hi Viresh, > > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:26:18AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> This helps managing them better and also reduces chances of adding= an header > >> file twice. >=20 > The aim is to maintain the list of header files in alphabetical order= =2E > It helps in maintaining > them.. I was adding some header files for my 3rd patch and was lookin= g > for the best > place to add them and because the list wasn't sorted, i sorted it out > in a separate patch. Why do you need to sort them? Is there _really_ a need? --=20 Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog