From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: Samsung: Do not register samsung audio dma device as pdev Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:46:46 +0900 Message-ID: <20121207064644.GI26070@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1354765837-3469-1-git-send-email-padma.v@samsung.com> <1354765837-3469-2-git-send-email-padma.v@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1354765837-3469-2-git-send-email-padma.v@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Padmavathi Venna Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, padma.kvr@gmail.com, sbkim73@samsung.com, lrg@ti.com, tiwai@suse.de, ben-linux@fluff.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, ben@simtec.co.uk, lrg@slimlogic.co.uk, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, anarsoul@gmail.com, graeme.gregory@wolfsonmicro.com, philipp.zabel@gmail.com, dgreenday@gmail.com, chripell@evolware.org, mcuelenaere@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:20:36AM +0530, Padmavathi Venna wrote: > Previously, the ASoC 'platform' (PCM/DMA) object was instantiated via a > platform_device. This didn't represent the hardware well, since there > was no separate hardware associated with this platform_device; it was a > virtual device with sole purpose to call snd_soc_register_platform(). Looks good however this doesn't apply against my topic/samsung branch - can you please check if I need anything from Kukjin's tree? Though I guess the easiest thing is just to wait until the merge window is over, we're near to the next release.