devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Support a PCI device that is compatible with 'simple-bus'
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:58:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121214215814.GA14149@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121214202629.BD40C3E0BDD@localhost>

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 08:26:29PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:

> > > If the soc_devices are getting triggered on that and they shouldn't be,
> > > then we need a mechanism in the soc_bridge node to kick out of that
> > > behavoir for its children.
> > 
> > Is this what you were thinking?
> 
> Not really. I see what you're trying to do, but doing it this way forces
> all children of PCI nodes to use the PCI addressing space. Others have
> had simple children of PCI devices and didn't use the PCI address layout
> at all. Those users would break with this approach.

Yes, that's right.

If you drop 'device_type=pci' from the PCI device (keep it on the host
bridge), then you can setup a ranges down to a smaller width and
things seem to work OK. That must be what other users are doing.

However, you can't stay at address-cells=3 for the children. That
doesn't work.

So, if you have separate PCI regions, like MMIO and prefetch it looks
like this works OK:

 pci_device@0 {
   ranges =
        // MMIO region, BAR 0
       <0x20000000 0x00000000  0x02000000 0x00000000 0x00000000  0x0 0x8000000
        // Prefetch region, BAR 1
        0x40000000 0x00000000  0x42000000 0x00000000 0x00000000  0x0 0x8000000>;

   #size-cells = <1>;
   #address-cells = <2>;
   sub {
     // MMIO region at BAR 0 offset 0x2000
     reg = <0x20000000 0x00002000 0x1000>;
   }
   sub2 {
     // Prefetch region at BAR 1 offset 0x4000
     reg = <0x40000000 0x00004000 0x1000>;
   }
 }

Which is weird, but OK..

This is good enough for my application.. fixing up address-cells=3 to
work generally seems pretty complicated at first blush?

> However, if you want to pass a unity mapping from the PCI device to the
> a child of it, it should be sufficient to use an empty 'ranges;'
> property in the PCI device node instead of listing out the ranges that
> you want to translate.

It isn't a unity mapping - the children see address 0 as being the
start of a BAR. The DTS has three levels of translation:

- platform device child - 0 is the start of a BAR in the pci device
- pci device - 0 is the start of the host bridge memory window for the
  BAR's type
- pci controller - 0 is the start of physical memory

Thanks,
Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-14 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-10 21:51 [PATCH] of: Support a PCI device that is compatible with 'simple-bus' Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-14 20:26 ` Grant Likely
2012-12-14 21:58   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
     [not found]     ` <20121214215814.GA14149-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-19 12:54       ` Grant Likely
2012-12-19 19:18         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-03-04  2:55           ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121214215814.GA14149@obsidianresearch.com \
    --to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).