From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>,
device-tree <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: OMAP2+: Add PMU nodes
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:38:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121217163858.GF16561@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355520397-5759-3-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 09:26:37PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Add PMU nodes for OMAP2, OMAP3 and OMAP4460 devices.
>
> Please note that the node for OMAP4460 has been placed in a separate
> header file for OMAP4460, because the node is not compatible with
> OMAP4430.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2.dtsi | 5 +++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-es.dts | 2 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4460.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4460.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2.dtsi
> index 761c4b6..27f5ea1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2.dtsi
> @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
> };
> };
>
> + pmu {
> + compatible = "arm,arm1136-pmu";
> + interrupts = <3>;
> + };
> +
> soc {
> compatible = "ti,omap-infra";
> mpu {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
> index 1acc261..6c63118 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
> @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@
> };
> };
>
> + pmu {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a8-pmu";
> + interrupts = <3>;
> + ti,hwmods = "debugss";
> + };
> +
> /*
> * The soc node represents the soc top level view. It is uses for IPs
> * that are not memory mapped in the MPU view or for the MPU itself.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-es.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-es.dts
> index 73bc1a6..2a6e344 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-es.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda-es.dts
> @@ -5,7 +5,9 @@
> * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> */
> +
> /include/ "omap4-panda.dts"
> +/include/ "omap4460.dtsi"
>
> /* Audio routing is differnet between PandaBoard4430 and PandaBoardES */
> &sound {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4460.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4460.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1270890
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4460.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/*
> + * Device Tree Source for OMAP4460 SoC
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any
> + * kind, whether express or implied.
> + */
> +
> +/ {
> + pmu {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-pmu";
> + interrupts = <0 54 0x4
> + 0 55 0x4>;
In other places I've seen interrupts properties written as:
interrupts = < irq1... >,
< irq2... >,
< irqN... >;
Where each individual interrupt is surrounded by angle brackets. This produces
the exact same dtb, but may appear easier to read.
This might not be the right time and place to raise it, but it'd be nice if we
used one style consistently.
> + ti,hwmods = "debugss";
> + };
> +};
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
>
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-17 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-14 21:26 [RESEND PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: Add PMU support for OMAP2+ Jon Hunter
2012-12-14 21:26 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Prepare for device-tree PMU support Jon Hunter
2012-12-14 21:26 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: OMAP2+: Add PMU nodes Jon Hunter
2012-12-17 16:38 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2012-12-17 16:58 ` Jon Hunter
2012-12-17 17:35 ` Benoit Cousson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121217163858.GF16561@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).