From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] ARM: dts: OMAP2+: Add PMU nodes Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:59:40 -0800 Message-ID: <20130111175939.GL14149@atomide.com> References: <1355766548-5702-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <1355766548-5702-3-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <50F01256.7030701@ti.com> <50F01AAD.8020003@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50F01AAD.8020003@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: Benoit Cousson , linux-omap , linux-arm , device-tree List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Jon Hunter [130111 06:02]: > Hi Benoit, > > On 01/11/2013 07:23 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > > > On 12/17/2012 06:49 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > >> Add PMU nodes for OMAP2, OMAP3 and OMAP4460 devices. > >> > >> Please note that the node for OMAP4460 has been placed in a separate > >> header file for OMAP4460, because the node is not compatible with > >> OMAP4430. The node for OMAP4430 is not included because PMU is not > >> currently supported on OMAP4430 due to the absence of a cross-trigger > >> interface driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter > > > > I've just applied this patch in my for_3.9/dts branch. > > > > I'm wondering if there is any dependency with the previous patch? If > > Tony ack it I can take it as well. > > I have been thinking about the best way to handle that. May be best for > you to take both if Tony can ack the first. Sounds good to me, I've acked it now. Tony