From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mfd/regulator: tps65090: add DT support and suspend/resume cleanups Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:33:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20130203223304.GB24304@sortiz-mobl> References: <1356686981-4152-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <20130203141931.GA8476@sortiz-mobl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130203141931.GA8476@sortiz-mobl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Laxman Dewangan Cc: linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, lrg-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Laxman, On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 03:19:31PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Hi Laxman, > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 02:59:37PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > > The patch series add DT support on TPS65090 device. > > > > Also remove the suspend/resume implementation as it duplicates with > > irq_suspend/irq_resume(). > > > > Laxman Dewangan (4): > > mfd: tps65090: add DT support for tps65090 > > regulator: tps65090: add DT support > > mfd: tps65090: Pass irq domain when adding mfd sub devices > > mfd: tps65090: remove suspend/resume callbacks > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/mfd/tps65090.c | 77 ++++++++---- > > drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 96 +++++++++++++++- > > include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h | 1 + > > 4 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt > All 4 patches applied to my for-next branch, thanks. Sorry for the confusion: I took v2 of your patchset, skipping the regulator patch who will go through Mark's tree. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/