From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Murray Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:38:28 +0000 Message-ID: <20130218093828.GA26245@arm.com> References: <1360570940-17086-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <1360570940-17086-2-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <20130213225311.37FFB3E3557@localhost> <20130214165341.GA29199@arm.com> <20130214191745.GA13875@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Thierry Reding , Grant Likely , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , Thomas Petazzoni , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:16:17PM +0000, Linus Walleij wrote: > n Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Thierry Reding > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 04:53:41PM +0000, Andrew Murray wrote: > >> Thierry, > >> > >> If you don't have much bandwidth I'd be quite happy to take this on - this > >> would be beneficial for my eventual patchset. I can start by refactoring common > >> implementations of pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges or similar across the > >> architectures as per Grant's suggestion? I didn't do this when I first posted > >> the patch as I was concerned about the testing effort. > > > > Absolutely! Since it was your patch in the first place you're just as > > well suited to do this if you want to and have the time. > > I am working on device tree patches for the Integrator/AP with it's > PCIv3 bridge, and I also follow this with great interest. I was almost > going to start the copy/paste cycle but now I think it's better if > I wait for this to happen. No problem - I am currently looking at this. Andrew Murray