From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] net: mvmdio: enhance driver to support SMI error/done interrupts Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:05:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20130315180503.GU4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1359473048-26551-1-git-send-email-florian@openwrt.org> <1363284515-9865-1-git-send-email-florian@openwrt.org> <1363284515-9865-4-git-send-email-florian@openwrt.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363284515-9865-4-git-send-email-florian@openwrt.org> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Fainelli Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Rob Landley , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Lennert Buytenhek , Thomas Petazzoni , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:08:34PM +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote: > + if (dev->err_interrupt == NO_IRQ) { ... > + init_waitqueue_head(&dev->smi_busy_wait); > + > + dev->err_interrupt = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > + if (dev->err_interrupt != -ENXIO) { ... > + } else > + dev->err_interrupt = NO_IRQ; FYI, NO_IRQ is not supposed to be used anymore (we're supposed to be removing it). platform_get_irq() returns negative numbers for failure, so why not test for < 0 in both the above tests, or maybe <= 0 (as IRQ0 is also not supposed to be valid.)?