From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: dts: Convert mvebu device tree files to 64 bits Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:08:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20130321220810.0c055f57@skate> References: <1363883179-1361-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1363883179-1361-6-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <20130321201533.GN21478@lunn.ch> <20130321212236.1015295d@skate> <20130321203751.GP21478@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130321203751.GP21478@lunn.ch> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Gregory CLEMENT , Jason Cooper , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Ezequiel Garcia , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Nicolas Pitre , Lior Amsalem , Maen Suleiman , Tawfik Bayouk , Shadi Ammouri , Eran Ben-Avi , Yehuda Yitschak , Nadav Haklai , Ike Pan , Chris Van Hoof , Dan Frazier , Leif Lindholm , Jon Masters List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Dear Andrew Lunn, On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:37:51 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > And I'm not sure the SDRAM address decoding windows allows to split the > > first 4 GB of RAM into two areas, one that would be mapped starting at > > physical address 0x0, and another area that would be mapped at a > > different address (above 4 GB). > > So why not map the whole SDRAM above 4GB physical address? That's a good question. The problem is most likely that this would require to synchronize with U-Boot modifications, which is not easy to achieve. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com