From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Revert the AT91RM9200_WATCHDOG dependency Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:33:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20130410133351.GA7295@roeck-us.net> References: <20130409202711.GG7867@spo001.leaseweb.com> <1365597382-15455-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1365597382-15455-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, wim@iguana.be, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , manabian@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:36:22PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Compiling the at91rm9200_wdt.c driver without at91rm9200 > support was leading to several errors: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_close': > at91_adc.c:(.text+0xc9fe4): undefined reference to `at91_st_base' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_write': > at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca004): undefined reference to `at91_st_base' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91wdt_shutdown': > at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca01c): undefined reference to `at91_st_base' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91wdt_suspend': > at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca038): undefined reference to `at91_st_base' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_open': > at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca0cc): undefined reference to `at91_st_base' > drivers/built-in.o:at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca2c8): more undefined references to > `at91_st_base' follow > > So, reverting the modification of the "depends" Kconfig line > introduced by patch a6a1bcd37 (watchdog: at91rm9200: add DT support) > seems to be the good solution. > Really ? Why ? I mean, this was supposed to be for at91rm9200, wasn't it ? And why would want try to compile a watchdog for at91rm9200 without at91rm9200 support ? I understand there is a problem, I just don't see how removing that line would solgve it. Guenter > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > --- > drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig > index 9fcc70c..e89fc31 100644 > --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ config ARM_SP805_WATCHDOG > > config AT91RM9200_WATCHDOG > tristate "AT91RM9200 watchdog" > - depends on ARCH_AT91 > + depends on ARCH_AT91RM9200 > help > Watchdog timer embedded into AT91RM9200 chips. This will reboot your > system when the timeout is reached. > -- > 1.8.0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >